t c all about governesses.

    It is done. t has begun.

    tion  kno is to come of it, I s myself cruel for inflicting it upon t to break .  for Adeline? For so be t altered by t life. I somorroing.

    time for anyt researc I o do one additional useful to conversation today eacside t office. I told  I o Jo truant and t so me if t again  reason. So teac time  it is not time, and terres, I told   foolis not being able to tell inctive  is no  all in identifying  o Jo doubt ion t time.

    I am not ing my diary mucely. I find t after ting, late at nigs I prepare every day about Emmeline’s progress, I am frequently too tired to keep up ivities. And I do  to keep a record of tor, on very important researco come, o look back and remember. Pers or o furtific and intellectual isfying tance, Dr. Maudsley and I  stimulating conversation on t of Emmeline’s use of pronouns. Ser inclination to speak to me, and y to communicate improves every day. Yet t of  is resistant to development is tence of t person plural. “e  to t  to ttle parrot s “I” after me, but in t sentence, “e saten in thing.

    tor and I are mucrigued by ty. Is it simply an ingrained  of speeco Englis t ime rigself? Or does t to te identity from t of er? I told tor about imaginary friends t so many disturbed c, and togetions of t if t t tion causes a mental trauma suc tion of an imaginary tasy companion? e arrived at no satisfactory conclusion but parted isfaction of ed anoture study: linguistics.

    ne