, to a Cupid ical proof, ivity, er developed by estern p decades.

    A  be added about Cses attitude to  to any reader t est romanticizers of ory, and t any of tes ells about Confucius, or Laotse or t be accepted on a par es ells about tion of General Clouds and Great Nebulous, or bet of t of t must be also plainly understood t   fantasy, ion and for t er kno he is frivolous when he is profound and profound when he is frivolous.

    tant text of Cse consists of ty-ters, all of ture of pion and anecdotes or parables. ters containing t virulent attacks on Confucianism (not included extual critics"  t seven cers. to understand because it is to talk of forgery. One can rest assured t textual critics" are unscientific because very little of it is picism, but consists of opinions as to style and o attack Confucius only in a mild and polisype of "criticism" in my long introduction to tory.) Only one or t, er interpolations and t is a subjective assertion of opinion. Even tions of style are faulty, and at least a distinction serpolations and side t seven cers, and it  even occurred to tics to provide an anso o be sure t even t eloquent exposition of t as forgery,  tse, o do lemen." On tes er generations into tremely loose structure of ters.

    I ers, including all but one of t best seven cers. ition, ters are translated complete. t important are ters on "Levelling All tumn Floods." ters, "Joined toes," "runks" and &quo