Jesus . Paul, Socrates by Plato, Confucius by Mencius, and Laotse by Cse. In all four cases, t eace no books or e very little, and to develop trines and e long and profound discourses. Cse, ed from Laotses deat quite tly a contemporary of Mencius. Yet t curious t alters mentioned time, neitioned by ther in his works.

    On tse must be considered test prose er of ty, as C be considered test poet. o tion rests botyle and t. t explains t t altest slanderer of Confucius, and se, test antagonist of Confucian ideas, no Confucian sc openly or secretly admired  openly agree erature.

    Nor can it be said truly t a pure-blooded Ce disagree ses ideas. taoism is not a sc in C is a deep, fundamental trait of Ctitude tooy. It ical sense of proportions; it enricry and imagination in an immeasurable manner, and it gives a pion to ic, vagabond C provides tic release from traint, and s t, and . As more people fail t t in a lame and ing manner aoist ideas are more often at  succeeds only aoist seng Kuofan, t Confucian general aoist y t o ant generals.

    Cse is tant as t one ic tained in tse. Unlike otical questions of government and personal morality, aping in Cerature before ticism raits in it, like  t contemplation and "seeing tary" explain ive C of tudy of trikes mysticism  seems Caoism skipped tific study of nature to reacuitive conclusion by insig is not surprising t Albert Einstein and Cse agree, as agree t, on tivity of all standards. t Einstein takes on t and