2.2  OF MONARCARY SUCCESSION

    Mankind being originally equals in tion, ty could only be destroyed by some subsequent circumstance; tinctions of ric measure be accounted for, and t  o the harsh, ill-sounding names of oppression and avarice.

    Oppression is often t seldom or never tously poor, it generally makes oo timorous to be hy.

    But ter distinction, for ural or religious reason can be assigned, and t is, tinction of men into KINGS and SUBJECtS.  Male and female are tinctions of nature, good and bad tinctions of  o ted above t, and distinguiso, and wo mankind.

    In to ture c is to confusion.   a king  century ts in Europe.  Antiquity favours t and rural lives of t patriarco tory of Jewisy.

    Government by kings  introduced into tom.

    It  prosperous invention t on foot for tion of idolatry.  to tian itle of sacred majesty applied to a !  As ting one man so greatly above t cannot be justified on ts of nature, so neit be defended on ty of scripture; for ty, as declared by Gideon and t Samuel, expressly disapproves of government by kings.  All anti-monarcs of scripture s, but tedly merit ttention of countries  to form.

    RENDER UNtO CAESAR ture doctrine of courts, yet it is no support of monarc, for t t time  a king, and in a state of vassalage to the Romans.

    No of tion, till tional delusion requested a king.

    till t (except in extraordinary cases, erposed) ered by a judge and tribes.  Kings t  title but ts.  And rous o t