r ser; meanuck  requiredmore food to sustain.” In otors t o survivesuccessfully for a housand years suddenly became an insuperable handicap.

    Above all t is almost never addressed is t Neandertals  ly larger ters for Neandertals versus 1.4 formodern people, according to one calculation. t for alt. I believe I speak trut nowion is suc made.

    So out and adaptable andcerebrally  muced)ans pers of an alternativetiregional  ion inuous—t just as australopito ime  us is, on t a separate speciesbut just a transitional p usforebears in C European us, and so on.

    “Except t for me tus,” says t’s a term s usefulness. For me, us is simply an earlier part of us. I believe onlyone species of  Africa, and t species ishomo sapiens.”

    Opponents of tiregional t it, in t instance, on t itrequires an improbable amount of parallel evolution by  t distant islands of Indonesia, iregionalism encourages a racist vie antook a very longtime to rid itself of. In t named Carleton Coon of ty of Pennsylvania suggested t some modern races  sources oforigin, implying t some of us come from more superior stock tably to earlier beliefs t some modern races suche African “Bushmen”

    (properly tralian Aborigines ive thers.

    ever Coon may personally , tion for many people  someraces are inly more advanced, and t some ially constitutedifferent species. tinctively offensive noable places until fairly recent times. I ime-Life Publications in 1961 called ticles in Lifemagazine. In it