g.” Rat. It is all someto intuition. Or as t J.

    B. S.  only queerer tis queerer than we can suppose.”

    t is usually given for explaining ture of space is to try to imaginesomeone from a universe of flat surfaces, oEartter ’s surface, he would never find an edge.

    eventually return to t ed, and terlyconfounded to explain  ion in space asour puzzled flatlander, only we are flummoxed by a higher dimension.

    Just as tand at ter and say: “t all began. termostpoint of it all.” e are all at ter of it all. Actually,  kno for sure;  prove it matically. Scientists just assume t  really be ter of t t  t t be till,  actually know.

    For us, t raveled in talk about—is amillion million million million (t’s 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) miles across. Butaccording to most t large—ta-universe, as it is sometimescalled—is vastly roomier still. According to Rees, t-years to tten not “en zeroes, not even  , t going totrouble of trying to envision some additional beyond.

    For a long time t troubled a lot of people—namely t it couldn’t begin to explain   of all tter t exists ed  matter consisted exclusively of lig ioned earlier. Not one particle of tuff so vital to our orogen, oxygen, and all t—emergedfrom tion. But—and roubling point—to forge ts, you need t and energy of a Big Bang. Yet t didn’t produce they come from?

    Interestingly, to t question  erm “Big Bang” sarcastically, as a. e’ll get to ly, but before urn to tion of  migaking a fees to cons