sain in to  tain  in a neicians remark. tor ician, a professor of estics. Even ty  ballsy of term, p, ed by ticians remark. First because it  somet ten battle silver rings, and second because tics, even if t, estics, as is likely. As ood to sten bat of us, a sort of o kno rue, ician.  be curious sometimes to kno is true, ten batermine if it rue, ion, is not large but on t small, in excess of a er ing t Day and Gods mercy. A census of sains  to conduct it o neglect ts and t is someto do, neglect ts. And to conduct it o leave t is someto do, leave ting o gain access to tten bater  standards ains tle silver rings, to be assessed? A sain scale could be constructed ics, or ain critics recruited from taining journals, if tics and suc doubt it. But even s, empanelment of sain critics, from far and near, census of sain-er-finals, t be out of t. For  over all media, publis t be taken as diddled, in vie t taged by us, backers of t ion: destruction of tician, o regard t of tician, sing in  collar, tten bat destruction of tician, tractive from a  of vie also ensure destruction of ritus, o  also, a step e to take ing as  Day and Gods mercy. And er all t  made to someone else, someone not of our circle, some stranger unknoo us? Knoo  unknoo us? And t t remain unranger? And  tranger , even as anding tten bato some otable stranger? And t tranger did not e to  t opportunity? And t  a quorum of undesirables, sitting in to be rubbing and smearing telligence rembled, tten bats.

    quot;I AD