AS a single man, I  a good deal of my time in noting doies of Married People, to console myself for tell me I  by remaining as I am.

    I cannot say t t impression upon me, or endency to strengti-social resolutions, antial considerations.  oftenest offends me at t, is an error of quite a different description; -- it is t too loving.

    Not too loving neit does not explain my meaning. Besides,  of separating t of to  of eacy, implies t to all the world.

    But  t up in t be in t  being made to feel, by some indirect  or open avo you are not t of taken for granted merely; but expressed, to accost t ured or plain-dressed young ell ly, t s  marry o be kicked for  no less is implied in t, t unity of putting tion to  t fit to do it. tands t  into  no reasonable young  as little rigo tell me by speec are scarce less plain t I am not t is enoug I kno: I do not  tual reminding.

    tly mortifying; but t of a palliative. t out to insult me, may accidentally improve me; and in tures, -- emporary usufruct at least. But tives: it is t pure, unrecompensed, unqualified insult.

    Marriage by its best title is a monopoly, and not of t invidious sort. It is t possessors of any exclusive privilege to keep tage as muc of sig ttle of t, may to question t. But ts t t obnoxious part of tent into our faces.

    Noto me more distasteful t entire complacency and satisfaction  of ticularly: it tells you, t  is disposed of in t you can  is true, I  trut, as I said before, to b